‘Withdrawing’ from international and European treaties to control immigration : What does the law say ?

Interview with Ségolène Barbou des Places, expert in public law

Many political declarations from the right to the far-right evoke a “withdrawal” from International treaties and European commitments, with the aim of regaining control over immigration. But things are not as simple as they seem. An international convention is a binding contract between the parties involved, and the repercussions of withdrawal may be severe.

Further readings

About the author

Ségo­lène Barbou des Places is a professor of public law at Univer­sité Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, a member of the Sorbonne Law School and a resear­cher at the Sorbonne Research Insti­tute for Inter­na­tional and Euro­pean Law (IREDIES, EA 4536). She is a CI Migra­tion fellow.

Cite this article

Ségo­lène Barbou des Places, “‘With­dra­wing’ from inter­na­tional and Euro­pean trea­ties to control immi­gra­tion : What does the law say?” in : Emeline Zoug­bédé, Michel Agier & Ségo­lène Barbou des Places (eds.), Feature “If France were to with­draw from inter­na­tional conven­tions?” De facto [online], 32 | March 2022. URL : https://www.icmigrations.cnrs.fr/en/2022/11/07/defacto-032–02/

Republication

De facto is publi­shed under the terms of the Crea­tive Commons Attri­bu­tion-No deri­va­tive 4.0 Inter­na­tional License (CC BY-ND 4.0). You are free to repu­blish this article free of charge online or in paper format, in accor­dance with these recom­men­da­tions. Do not edit the article, mention the author and specify that this article was publi­shed by De facto | CI Migra­tion. To obtain the embed code of this article, please write to defacto@​icmigrations.​fr