PUBLI : Johann Cailhol, Marie-Christine Lebon et William Sherlaw, « Will my patients get their residence permit ? A critical analysis of the ethical dilemmas involved in writing medical certificates for residence permits in France », BMC Medical Ethics, vol. 21, n° 59 [en ligne], 2020

Abstract

Back­ground
France has long been a country of immi­gra­tion and in some respects may be seen to have a gene­rous policy with respect to asylum seekers and access to health care for migrants. The French state notably provides heal­th­care access for undo­cu­mented migrants, through state medical aid and since 1998 has had a huma­ni­ta­rian policy for gran­ting tempo­rary resi­dence permits for medical reason (TRPMR) to migrants. Within a context of poli­tical debate, reform and tigh­te­ning immi­gra­tion control we will examine this latter policy focu­sing espe­cially on the dilemmas that arise for physi­cians of migrant patients when they are requested to write medical certi­fi­cates as part of a TRPMR appli­ca­tion. In a 2017 reform the key role of making recom­men­da­tions on the gran­ting or not of permits was handed over to Ministry of the Interior health inspec­tors. Recom­men­da­tions are made after perusal of medical certi­fi­cates esta­bli­shed by the migrant’s physi­cian and comple­men­tary evidence.

Main body
The writing of medical certi­fi­cates by a physi­cian would seem straight­for­ward. This is far from the case since it raises a number of ethical dilemmas. These occur within a physi­cian-patient rela­tion­ship embedded within a social contract between the State, the physi­cian and the migrant patient. To clarify the ethical issues arising 3 vignettes based on prac­tice within an infec­tious disease unit at a large Paris hospital have been deve­loped. The vignettes high­light ethical dilemmas in the care for migrants with tuber­cu­losis (dilemma in defi­ning health and disease), chronic hepa­titis (dilemma between bene­fi­cence and do not harm), and HIV /​AIDS (issue of deser­vin­gness). We will go on to reflect on issues of social justice and respon­si­bi­lity for the health of migrants within a globa­lized world.

Conclu­sions
Criteria for resi­dence permit deli­very appear less than clear-cut and are inter­preted in a restric­tive way. Neither are the conse­quences of refu­sing a resi­dence permit taken into account. We call for an empi­rical trans­na­tional ethics study invol­ving coun­tries imple­men­ting similar TRPMR poli­cies. We also call for inclu­sion of lobbying compe­tences into the medical under­gra­duate curri­cula, in order to breed future gene­ra­tions of physi­cians skilled in defen­ding social justice.

Page de référence